10 Best Free Contract Templates & Management Tools For 2026

Streamlining contract management without the enterprise price tag

Contracts are the operating system of every business, yet for many teams, managing them remains a chaotic mix of scattered emails, lost versions, and manual reminders. In the past, bringing order to this chaos meant investing in expensive, heavy Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) software that was often overkill for growing companies. But as we move into 2026, the landscape has shifted.

Today, powerful contract workflows don’t require a massive budget. Whether you are looking for a visual workspace to map out complex agreements, a flexible database to track renewals, or a quick way to handle e-signatures, there is likely a free or low-cost tool that fits your needs perfectly. Modern platforms have democratized access to structured drafting, automated approvals, and legal-grade templates, allowing startups and SMBs to operate with the same rigor as large enterprises.

In this guide, we explore the 10 best free contract templates and management tools available right now. From all-in-one workspaces like AFFiNE to specialized utilities for clause research and document signing, these options will help you build a reliable contract stack that keeps your deals moving and your risks managed—without the enterprise price tag.

Option 1 AFFiNE best overall free contract workspace

When you juggle NDAs, MSAs, and SOWs across email and random folders, things break fast. AFFiNE gives you one structured, visual workspace where contracts are drafted, negotiated, and tracked like a real end to end contract management flow instead of a pile of files.

Why this is best overall for free contract templates

Imagine starting every agreement from an approved template and never worrying that numbering, headings, or clause cross-references will fall apart. AFFiNE’s block-based editor is built for exactly that. Each heading, clause, and list sits in its own block, so when you move or duplicate sections in an NDA, MSA, or SOW, the layout stays clean and professional instead of breaking like in many traditional word processors.

On top of that, you can embed lightweight database tables directly into your contract pages. These tables act like mini contract lifecycle management software inside your workspace. You can:

• Track key clauses (e.g., Limitation of Liability, Data Security, IP Ownership) with status and risk level.

• List approvers and signers with roles, due dates, and comments.

• Capture renewal dates, auto-renew flags, and reminders for upcoming reviews.

This turns your drafting space into a living contract repository management layer rather than static documents scattered in folders. As AFFiNE’s own document management guidance highlights, a single source of truth plus standardized templates dramatically reduces confusion and rework by keeping everyone aligned on which version is final and where it lives (source).

When contracts get more complex, you can switch to Edgeless canvases, AFFiNE’s whiteboard-style mode. Here you visually map obligations, dependencies, and approval flows around your agreements. For example, you might:

• Draw a simple flow from Draft → Legal Review → InfoSec Review → Business Owner Approval → Signature.

• Attach blocks for each obligation (e.g., SLAs, reporting duties) and link them to responsible owners.

• Cluster vendor agreements by risk tier and connect them to related SOWs or project plans.

Because AFFiNE merges documents, whiteboards, and databases into one workspace, you get clm software with an intuitive interface feel without having to glue together multiple tools.

You can also explore and duplicate free templates (including SOW and contract-style structures) from the AFFiNE template hub at https://affine.pro/templates, then adapt them into your own central contract repository.

Key workflows to set up fast

Want to turn AFFiNE into your free contract management software in under an hour? Start with these practical steps.

• Create a central contract repository boardOn a new board, add a database view named “Contracts”. This becomes your central contract repository where every NDA, MSA, SOW, and order form is a record, not a loose file.

• Add core contract propertiesFor each record, define properties such as:

• Counterparty


• Contract type (NDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, Order Form)


• Effective date and term end


• Renewal window and auto-renew toggle


• Internal owner (Legal, Sales, Procurement, or specific person)


• Risk tier (Low, Medium, High)

These fields give you contract management automation basics, like quick filters for “Renewals in 60 days” or “High-risk agreements without InfoSec review”.

• Pre-link a clause libraryCreate a separate database for “Clauses” with tags for topics (Liability, Indemnity, Data Security, Insurance, Payment). Link this database to your Contracts view so you can:

• Attach approved clauses to each contract record.


• Track which fallback clauses are used most often.


• Standardize language across different agreements.

• Draft contracts in blocksOpen a contract record and start drafting the agreement as a page using blocks:

• Use heading blocks for core sections like Definitions, Scope, Fees, IP, Confidentiality, Term, and Termination.


• Insert database-powered tables for deliverables, milestones, or service levels (especially for SOWs).


• Keep negotiation notes and internal comments in separate blocks so they never slip into the final PDF.

• Convert to PDF when readyOnce the content is finalized, export or print to PDF for signature with your chosen signing tool. This keeps AFFiNE focused on being the best contract lifecycle management software style workspace for drafting and tracking, while letting you plug in any e-sign provider you prefer.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Structured authoring – Block-based editing keeps NDAs, MSAs, and SOWs cleanly formatted even after heavy edits.

• Visual mapping – Edgeless canvases help you map obligations, dependencies, and workflows around your contracts.

• Repository-by-design – Embedded databases turn AFFiNE into a practical contract repository management hub rather than a simple file bucket.

• Unified workspace – Documents, whiteboards, and databases live together, which supports more seamless end to end contract management.

Cons

• Native e-sign needs confirmation – You will want to confirm whether built-in e-signature meets your needs or if you should pair AFFiNE with a separate signing tool.

• Advanced analytics via views – Deep reporting may require thoughtful use of filters, views, and linked tables rather than one prebuilt analytics dashboard.

Best for and use cases

• SMB legal ops teams that want a flexible, low-friction workspace instead of heavy enterprise-only contract lifecycle management software.

• Distributed teams that need a single, cloud-based place to draft, review, and store agreements with comments and visual workflows.

• Startups that need one workspace to draft contracts, manage approvals, and centralize records without paying for complex CLM suites.

In all these scenarios, AFFiNE effectively acts as clm software with an intuitive interface, especially when you combine pages, databases, and canvases into a single project or vendor workspace.

Negotiation playbook

To make AFFiNE even more powerful, store your negotiation playbook right next to your templates. For each key clause, keep a “Preferred” version and at least one fallback version your legal team has already vetted.

Service Levels If metrics are unavailable, insert 'Provider will use commercially reasonable efforts; material failure for two consecutive months constitutes a service breach with a 30-day cure period.'

In practice, you can create a “Service Levels” record in your Clauses database with:

• A description of when to use the fallback.

• Risk notes for internal readers.

• Links to prior deals where this language was accepted.

During negotiations, you simply open the linked clause in AFFiNE, drop the approved fallback language into your contract block, and keep the thread of comments in the same workspace.

HTML cues

To keep your AFFiNE workspace scannable and consistent, mirror some of these patterns in your own templates.

• Core setup checklist for a new contract in AFFiNE

• Create or duplicate a contract template page from [AFFiNE’s template hub](https://affine.pro/templates).


• Add the contract to your “Contracts” database with counterparty, owner, and renewal fields filled in.


• Link relevant clauses from your Clauses database (Liability, Indemnity, Data Security).


• Insert a small obligations table with owner, due date, and status.


• Tag stakeholders in comments for review instead of sending file copies by email.


• Export to PDF and move the signed copy into your “Final” or “Archive” view once executed.

Used this way, AFFiNE becomes a practical, free contract management software style hub. You get structured drafting, visual process mapping, and contract records in one place, without the overhead that often comes with traditional enterprise CLM tools.

Option 2 Notion flexible database driven templates

Sounds complex to build a contract repository system from scratch? With Notion, you can assemble one from simple building blocks that feel more like a digital notebook than heavy IT. Its mix of docs and databases gives small teams a practical way to draft, store, and track agreements without committing to full enterprise contract lifecycle management tools.

Why choose this for flexible contract repositories

Notion is an all-in-one workspace where notes, tasks, and databases live on the same page, which makes it well suited to organize contracts for small teams and growing companies (source). Instead of scattered folders, you can build a connected contract repository system where every agreement is a record, a page, and a workflow step at the same time.

The key strength is databases. Notion lets you turn a simple table into a powerful contract tracking hub with:

• Clause libraries and line items stored in dedicated databases, so you can reuse approved language instead of retyping it.

• Relation properties that link contracts to vendors, matters, or projects, giving you a connected view rather than siloed files.

• Board views (Kanban style) that show each agreement moving through draft, review, and signature stages, much like lightweight contract lifecycle management tools.

Because Notion is composable, you build your own system from modular parts that can be reconfigured as your processes change (source). That flexibility is especially helpful when you need a contract management app that can evolve without long implementation projects.

Setup checklist

Imagine opening Notion and having all your core contract data in one place by the end of the day. You can get close with this simple setup.

• Create a Contracts databaseStart with a table view called "Contracts" and add fields such as:

• Counterparty (text or relation to a Vendors database)


• Effective date (date)


• Term end (date)


• Renewal date or renewal window (date or formula)


• Owner (person)


• Risk level (select: Low, Medium, High)


• Status (select: Draft, Internal Review, Vendor Review, Signed, Archived)

This becomes your central place to manage contract records, much like entry-level contract management software for small business would, but with more flexibility.

• Add a Clauses databaseSet up a second database named "Clauses" with fields for:

• Clause name


• Topic tag (Liability, Indemnity, Data Security, IP, Payment)


• Preferred language


• Fallback language

Then add a relation from Contracts to Clauses, so each agreement can reference the exact playbook language you want to use.

• Create a lifecycle Kanban boardFrom the Contracts database, add a board view grouped by Status. This gives you a visual pipeline for contract tracking from creation through execution.

• Layer in simple compliance checksUse filters and views as lightweight contract compliance tools. For example, create a view for "High risk" contracts without a completed Legal owner field.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Quick to customize – You design the structure, so it can mirror your current approval paths and reporting needs.

• Rich template ecosystem – Notion offers many templates, including contract-related ones, that you can adapt instead of starting from zero.

• Collaborative comments – Multiple stakeholders can comment and edit on the same page in real time, which makes it easier to manage contract discussions.

• All-in-one workspace – Docs, tasks, and wikis sit next to your contract databases, reducing tool switching.

Cons

• No native redlining – You do not get traditional legal redline tools, so detailed markups may need external editors.

• E-sign needs integrations – Signatures and advanced permissions often rely on connecting Notion to other apps; confirm your integration options before rolling out.

• Not a full CLM – While flexible, it is not a turnkey best-of-breed CLM platform; you assemble your own flows rather than buying an out-of-the-box best contract lifecycle management software suite.

• Varied learning curve – Power users love the flexibility, but some teammates may need guidance to use filters, relations, and views effectively.

Best for and use cases

• SMBs that want an affordable, flexible workspace instead of rigid contract management software for small business packages.

• Solo counsel or fractional legal support that need one place to log matters, store templates, and track contract stages.

• Product and ops teams who prefer a single contract management app that can also hold specs, project plans, and vendor notes.

For these groups, Notion can act as a bridge between basic docs and full-scale contract lifecycle management tools, especially when you pair it with e-sign and storage services.

Negotiation tips

You will notice that storing playbook guidance directly in your Clauses database speeds up negotiations. For each key issue, keep a short note on when you can flex and how far.

Limitation of Liability If counterparties reject a cap at fees paid, fallback to 'the greater of fees paid in the prior 12 months or a fixed dollar cap mutually agreed by the parties.'

Use properties and comments to flag which fallback positions are approved, and link agreements back to the deals where those terms were accepted. Over time, this creates an internal knowledge base that is more informative than many generic contract management software reviews because it reflects your actual risk posture.

HTML cues

To keep your workspace scannable, it helps to standardize how you structure templates and lifecycle views.

• Template starter pack – Create one Notion page per base template, such as:

• NDA


• MSA


• SOW


• Contractor Agreement


• Simple Sales Contract

Turn each into a template button or duplicate-once-per-deal pattern, and link the resulting page back to the Contracts database record.

• Lifecycle and ownership table – Add a small table view on your main contracts page to clarify who owns each stage.

Used this way, Notion becomes a practical layer in your stack to manage contract data and workflows, while other tools in this guide handle specialized drafting, redlining, or e-sign needs. Next, you can look at how a simple docs-and-storage combo can help when your priority is fast collaboration over structure.

Option 3 Google Docs and Drive simple drafting and storage

When you need to get a contract out the door today, spinning up a heavyweight CLM stack is rarely realistic. Google Docs and Drive give you a fast, familiar way to draft, redline, and store agreements, especially for small teams still figuring out how to track contracts without a full platform.

Why this is the easiest start for drafting

Google Docs is built for real-time collaboration, which makes it a practical entry-level choice for contract drafting software. Multiple people can type, comment, and edit the same agreement at once, so sales, legal, and finance stay in sync instead of passing static files around.

For redlines, you use Suggesting mode , which works much like track changes in traditional contract redline software. As HyperStart’s guide to redlining explains, Suggesting mode lets every edit appear as a visible markup that can be accepted or rejected, with comments threaded alongside the text for context (source). That means you can:

• Show insertions, deletions, and formatting tweaks as suggestions rather than permanent changes.

• Hold clause-by-clause conversations in the comment pane without touching the base text.

• Use version history as a lightweight audit trail if you need to restore an earlier draft.

On the storage side, Google Drive acts as your basic digital contract management layer. It gives you centralized cloud folders so contracts are not scattered across email and laptops. As HyperStart notes, cloud-based repositories make contracts more accessible, visible, and secure than ad hoc drives or cabinets, helping teams retrieve agreements faster and reduce administration time.

Setup walkthrough

Want a simple but reliable structure you can build in an afternoon? Here is a practical setup that keeps your digital contract management organized without extra tools.

• Design your Drive folder structure

• Create a top-level folder, for example, _Contracts_.


• Inside it, add subfolders by contract type: _NDA_ , _MSA_ , _SOW_ , _DPAs_ , _Vendor Agreements_.


• Within each type, nest folders by year, such as _2025_ , _2026_ , mirroring the structured approaches recommended for effective contract storage [(source)](https://www.hyperstart.com/blog/contract-storage/).

• Turn key agreements into Docs templates

• Create a Google Doc for each base template: NDA, MSA, SOW, and standard order form.


• Save them in a dedicated _Templates_ subfolder under _Contracts_.


• When starting a new deal, _Make a copy_ of the relevant template and move it into the correct type/year folder.

• Add a header table for metadata

• At the top of each template, insert a 2-column table that captures essentials, for example:

This manual metadata gives you a simple way to manage contract details without a full database.

• Standardize headings for faster reviews

• Use Docs heading styles to outline common sections: Definitions, Scope, Payment, IP, Liability, Confidentiality, Term and Termination, Governing Law.


• The outline panel in Docs lets reviewers jump to high-risk clauses instantly, which is especially useful when you are still relying on basic tools while exploring the best contract management software for small business.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Ubiquitous and easy to adopt – Most users already know Docs and Drive, so there is almost no training.

• Real-time collaboration – Multiple stakeholders can redline in Suggesting mode and comment at the same time.

• Good version history – Version history lets you see who changed what and roll back if needed.

• Simple cloud storage – Centralized folders provide a basic contract storage layer that is easier to manage than scattered emails or physical files.

Cons

• Limited structured metadata – Key fields like value, risk level, or renewal terms live in the body of the document, not in a searchable database.

• Search depends on naming discipline – If users ignore naming conventions or folder rules, Drive quickly becomes hard to navigate.

• No contract-specific workflows – There are no built-in approval routes or dashboards, so you track status manually in spreadsheets or email.

• Weaker controls for complex reviews – As HyperStart points out, Docs lacks clause-level intelligence, structured workflows, and granular permissions that dedicated CLM tools provide.

Best for and use cases

• Small teams that need a free, fast way to draft and redline contracts while they learn how to track contracts more systematically.

• Agencies and consultancies that send repeat NDAs, MSAs, and SOWs and want simple collaboration plus PDF exports.

• Early-stage founders who need a practical starting point before investing in the best contract management software for small business or more advanced CLM solutions.

In each of these cases, the goal is to get structure in place quickly, then layer on more specialized tools later without disrupting day-to-day work.

Negotiation playbook

Even with a lightweight stack, you can standardize negotiations by embedding fallback language directly in your templates or in an internal “Playbook” Doc stored alongside them.

Payment Terms Net 30; late payments accrue 1.5% per month or the maximum allowed by law, whichever is lower.

Keep commonly negotiated clauses like payment terms, limitation of liability, and SLAs in a separate reference Doc. During review, copy the approved fallback language into the working contract instead of rewriting it each time.

HTML cues

To keep permissions and access clear, map your Drive folders to departments so the right people can see and edit each file.

Once this basic Docs-and-Drive stack is in place, you will have a clearer picture of your gaps in automation, reporting, and approvals. That makes it much easier to decide when to move from simple cloud folders to more specialized drafting or contract drafting software, or even to a dedicated platform for higher-volume work.

Option 4 PandaDoc fast templates and basic e sign

When you send the same proposals and contracts over and over, manually rebuilding each one is a drain. PandaDoc offers a template-first workflow with built-in e-signature, so you can turn repeat documents into reusable, semi-automated flows instead of one-off files.

Why choose this for templatized contracts and e-sign

PandaDoc is designed as an all-in-one document tool where you create, edit, and sign business documents in one place, especially for proposals, quotes, and contracts. For teams that do a lot of standardized MSAs, SOWs, and order forms, its strength is the way it combines templates, content libraries, and e-sign into a single interface.

Inside the editor, you can build templates using reusable content blocks, such as text sections, pricing tables, and signature fields. Higher tiers also support smart content blocks that dynamically insert content from the library based on conditions, like a product in a pricing table or a variable value. That means you can configure rules so certain clauses appear only when a deal includes specific services or regions.

Variables are another core feature. PandaDoc lets you define variables for common data points such as client name, company, email, or pricing table totals, and then reuse them throughout the document. When the document is generated from a template, those variable values are populated automatically, which helps reduce manual typing errors and keeps details consistent.

On top of that, PandaDoc includes integrated e-signature so you can send, track, and complete signatures without leaving the platform. Documents can be shared by email, link, or even text message, and the dashboard shows each item’s status (Draft, Completed, Viewed), helping you keep track of where agreements sit in the signing process (source). For teams comparing options in contract lifecycle management software reviews, this combination of templates plus e-sign is a key differentiator when most of your work centers on standardized documents.

Because the free version is more limited and many advanced blocks are tied to paid plans, you will want to confirm current free plan capabilities on PandaDoc’s site before assuming full automation. The same is true if you are trying to align it with the best clm solutions; PandaDoc is strong on document generation and signing, but feature access depends heavily on plan level.

Setup guidance

Imagine your sales team sends the same MSA and SOW structure on every deal. Here is a practical way to turn that into a repeatable flow using PandaDoc’s template and variable capabilities.

• Build a base MSA template

• Start with a new template in PandaDoc and paste in your approved MSA language.


• Replace data that changes per deal (client name, address, dates, fees) with variables, using PandaDoc’s role and pricing table variables, such as `Client.FirstName` or pricing table totals.


• Insert signature and date fields for each party toward the end of the document.

• Add a clause and content library

• Save common sections (cover letter, data protection addendum, regional terms) as content library items.


• For more advanced automation on supported plans, use smart content blocks and conditional rules so that specific content library items appear when a pricing table includes certain products or when a variable matches a region or industry [(source)](https://support.pandadoc.com/en/articles/9714634-smart-content-block-conditional-content).


• This approach turns PandaDoc into lightweight contract automation tools for repeat scenarios, especially when your language varies in predictable ways.

• Define an approval path for high-risk deals

• For organizations using higher-tier plans, PandaDoc can layer in approval workflows so key stakeholders must sign off before a contract is sent externally.


• You can model a simple path such as Draft → Sales Manager Approval → Legal Approval → Send to Customer, and assign specific users as approvers within the workflow setup.


• This helps you move toward the kind of oversight people expect from top clm software without deploying a separate system.

• Connect with your broader workflow

• Where available on paid plans, PandaDoc integrates with popular CRMs and payment tools, so variables can be populated from CRM records, and signed documents can sync back to deals.


• Free eSign users have more limited integrations; confirm which connections are supported at your level before designing a process that depends on them.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Polished templates and editor – The interface is clean and intuitive, with a large template gallery for different document types.

• Fast e-sign built in – You can prepare, send, and sign documents in one tool, avoiding the friction of moving files between separate systems.

• Variables and smart content reduce errors – Using variables and conditional content helps keep names, addresses, and deal terms consistent throughout the document.

• Content library for reuse – Frequently used sections can be stored and reused, which is valuable for service contract management software style workflows where you rely on common clauses.

Cons

• Free plan is heavily limited – Many advanced features, including some content blocks, integrations, and workflow tools, are locked behind paid tiers, and the free eSign version functions more as a basic signing utility.

• Repository depth varies – While folders and smart views help organization, it is not a full electronic contract management system focused on deep repository analytics.

• Redline controls are basic – You can edit documents and use comments, but it is not dedicated contract negotiation software with granular clause comparison tools.

• Plan-dependent features – Automation features like conditional content and some approvals are only on specific plans, so you must review plan details before designing complex flows (source).

Best for and use cases

• Sales-led teams that send a high volume of similar proposals, quotes, and MSAs and want a streamlined way to generate and sign them without leaving a single interface.

• Agencies that repeatedly send project SOWs, renewals, or change orders and benefit from templates plus quick e-sign in a semi-automated flow.

• Service firms that work with standardized engagement letters or service agreements and need reliable service contract management software style capabilities without a full-scale repository project.

For these groups, PandaDoc sits between pure e-sign apps and broader best clm platforms, focusing more on document creation and signing than on deep post-signature analytics.

Negotiation fallback language

Even with a template-heavy approach, you still need clear fallback language for recurring negotiation points. One common area is intellectual property ownership in services agreements.

Contractor assigns all intellectual property created under this agreement upon full payment.

You can store this as your default IP clause in the content library, then create alternative versions for situations where the provider retains certain pre-existing IP or where licenses are more appropriate than assignment. Over time, this library becomes one of your most useful contract automation tools, since it lets you swap in approved language without drafting from scratch.

HTML cues

To keep your PandaDoc workspace organized, it helps to be explicit about who signs and who approves each document, and where variable data comes from.

• Required signers and approvers checklist

• Customer signer (name, email, role)


• Internal business owner (sales or account manager)


• Internal legal approver (if required on your plan)


• Finance approver for high-value or non-standard terms


• Security or compliance approver for data-heavy engagements

• Data source mapping for variables – Decide ahead of time whether key variables are filled manually or via integrations, especially if you are aiming to align with practices common in top clm software.

By clarifying roles, approvals, and variable sources, you turn PandaDoc from a simple e-sign tool into a structured, repeatable document engine that fits neatly alongside more repository-focused or analytics-heavy tools in your broader contract stack.

Option 5 Airtable customizable contract tracker template

When spreadsheets stop scaling but full CLM feels like overkill, a no-code database can be a sweet spot. Airtable gives you the structure of a database with the familiarity of a grid, so you can build a practical contract repository solution without writing a line of code.

Why choose this for structured tracking

Airtable is a cloud platform that blends spreadsheet-style views with database power, letting teams design custom workflows for many types of documents (source). That flexibility makes it well suited for airtable contract management setups where you need structured fields, attachments, and automations, but not a heavy implementation project.

You can create separate tables for key dimensions such as:

• Agreements – every NDA, MSA, SOW, or order form is a record with structured fields and attached files.

• Counterparties – vendors, customers, and partners with contact data and risk notes.

• Obligations – deliverables, SLAs, and renewal tasks linked back to the underlying contract.

Linkable records connect these tables, so one vendor can relate to many contracts, and one agreement can have many obligations. This is where Airtable’s database-style relationships go beyond a normal spreadsheet and turn into real contract database management. You can then create filtered views such as:

• Renewal in 90 Days – shows contracts whose term end or renewal window is approaching.

• High Risk – filters by risk tier or missing security review.

• In Negotiation – focuses on active redlines for legal and business owners.

For teams that integrate Airtable with a dedicated contract platform like Juro, you can even sync contract status changes automatically via no-code tools. New contracts created or updated in Juro can trigger record creation or updates in Airtable, keeping your repository current without manual entry. Used this way, Airtable becomes a flexible layer that supports the kind of dashboards you would expect from the best renewal management software, while another platform handles authoring and signatures.

Setup blueprint

Imagine opening Airtable and, within an afternoon, having a live dashboard for renewals and obligations. This setup gives you a solid foundation.

• Create an Agreements tableRecommended fields include:

• Status (Draft, Review, Signed, Expired)


• Type (NDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, Order Form)


• Effective Date


• Term End


• Renewal Window (e.g., 60/90 days before term end)


• Auto Renew (checkbox)


• Contract Value


• Owner (single select or collaborator)


• Counterparty (linked to Counterparties table)


• Attachments (upload signed PDFs and working drafts)

This becomes your central hub for contract renewal software style views and reports.

• Build a Counterparties tableFields like company name, main contact, region, and risk rating give you a quick way to see who you are contracting with. Link this to Agreements so you can roll up contract counts and total value per vendor or customer.

• Add an Obligations tableCreate records for milestones, SLAs, and reporting requirements with fields for:

• Related Agreement (linked to Agreements)


• Obligation Type (SLA, Deliverable, Report)


• Due Date


• Responsible Owner


• Status (Open, In Progress, Complete)

This helps turn contracts into actionable work items, not just stored PDFs.

• Link to a Clauses tableCreate a Clauses table that stores approved and fallback language for key topics. Link relevant clauses to each agreement so reviewers can see which standard wording should apply.

• Configure key views and filtersSet up views like "Renewals in 90 Days" (filter on Term End and Status = Signed) and "High Risk" (filter by risk level or missing approvals). These views make Airtable feel like renewal management software tailored to your workflows.

If you connect Airtable to a dedicated contract system via Zapier, you can automate record creation and updates whenever a contract is created, approved, or signed, cutting manual admin and keeping your data in sync (source).

Pros and cons

Pros

• Flexible schema – You design tables and fields to match your processes instead of bending to a rigid model.

• Easy filters and views – Grid, calendar, and kanban views make it simple to track upcoming renewals, open obligations, and contract status.

• File attachments – Attach draft and signed copies directly to records, keeping documents tied to structured data.

• No-code automation potential – Integrations with tools like Juro let you automate record creation and updates based on contract events.

Cons

• Drafting happens elsewhere – Airtable is not a full editor for long-form legal documents; you typically draft in Word or another tool.

• Permissions need careful design – You must plan views and sharing rules to ensure only the right people can see sensitive contracts.

• Audit trail is limited – While you can see changes, it is not a specialized legal audit log, so regulated teams may still need a dedicated system.

Best for and use cases

• Procurement teams that want contract management for procurement, including dashboards for vendor agreements, spend, and renewals across categories.

• Business operations teams that need a central pane of glass for agreements, linked to projects, budgets, or OKRs.

• Revenue operations (RevOps) that track customer contracts, ARR, and renewal dates in one place, connecting to CRM where needed.

In these scenarios, Airtable acts as a configurable layer that brings data from multiple systems together, helping you approximate features you would expect from the best renewal management software without committing to a single vendor stack.

Negotiation helper

Because Airtable stores structured data and documents together, it is a natural place to keep your negotiation playbook. For example, you can add a field in the Clauses table for "Fallback Position" and another for "When to Use."

Information independently developed without use of Confidential Information remains outside the definition.

Store this language in the clause record for Confidentiality exceptions, with notes on when you can accept broader carve outs. During a negotiation, legal and procurement teams can quickly see approved alternatives and reference past deals linked to the same clause.

HTML cues

To make your base more scannable and predictable, define clear stage gates and SLAs for each step in the contract process.

You can mirror these stages using single-select fields and filtered views in Airtable, then embed forms for contract intake. For example, a simple intake form feeding your Agreements table lets business users submit new requests, which are automatically routed to the right owner based on contract type or value. That keeps your process consistent while giving stakeholders a simple, self-service entry point before contracts move into drafting in your chosen editor.

From here, teams that outgrow spreadsheets and simple drives can use Airtable as an organized bridge into more specialized tools, while the next options in this list explore platforms that emphasize legal formatting, clause research, and standardized templates.

Option 6 Microsoft Word Online familiar redlining and styles

When negotiations get dense and every comma matters, most lawyers still reach for Word. Microsoft Word Online keeps that familiar environment in the browser, making it a natural anchor for legal contract management even as you surround it with more modern tools.

Why choose this for redlines and legal formatting

Redlining is the backbone of contract negotiation. It means making visible, trackable edits that the other side can review and accept or reject. In practice, this is usually done with Word’s Track Changes feature, which highlights insertions, deletions, and formatting edits directly in the document. According to SpotDraft, roughly 90% of lawyers use Microsoft Word to create legal documents, and 56% spend over three hours in Word every business day. That deep familiarity is a big reason Word remains the default redline environment.

With Track Changes turned on, every modification appears as a suggestion, tagged with the reviewer’s name and time. The document owner can then accept or reject each change or handle them in bulk. This makes negotiations transparent and auditable, which is crucial when you later need to explain how the final language evolved (source).

For bigger revisions, Word’s document comparison tools let you generate a blackline between two versions to reveal changes that might have slipped through untracked, a common safeguard when you are worried someone turned Track Changes off mid-stream. On top of that, Word’s style system supports precise numbering for clauses, schedules, and exhibits. When you use consistent styles, you avoid broken numbering and messy formatting that often surface when contracts are copied between tools. This is why, even as newer platforms emerge, Word still plays a central role in many contract document management system setups.

Setup advice

To get the most from Word Online in a legal context, you will want to invest a bit of time in your templates and structure.

• Create a master contract template

• Open Word on desktop, create a document that will serve as your house style for NDAs, MSAs, and SOWs.


• Define styles for headings, definitions, body text, schedules, and signature blocks, using automatic numbering for clause levels. As Weagree notes, these .dotx templates control fonts, sizes, numbering, and indentation, shaping the overall look of your contracts.


• Save it as a Word Template (.dotx), then upload it to your shared location so everyone starts from the same base.

• Use styles for clean numbering

• Map clause levels (Article, Section, Subsection) to multi-level list styles instead of manual numbering.


• Keep dependent styles linked so a change to the base style cascades consistently, a best practice emphasized in the Weagree guidance on contract house styles [(source)](https://weagree.com/clm/admin-video-tutorials/contract-house-styles/contract-styling-using-custom-word-templates/).

• Add basic content controls

• For repeat data points like party names, addresses, and effective dates, insert content controls or clearly marked placeholders.


• This reduces manual retyping and helps avoid inconsistent party names across the document.

• Store templates centrally

• Place your .dotx files in a shared library (OneDrive, SharePoint, or another DMS) and make them read-only for most users.


• Team members create new contracts by using _New from template_ , preserving your styles and formatting.

Used this way, Word Online becomes the drafting and redlining front end, while your storage layer and workflows live in whatever you choose as your answer to the question what is a contract management system for your organization: maybe SharePoint, a dedicated CLM, or a legal DMS.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Ubiquitous and familiar – Most lawyers and business users already know Word; training needs are minimal, which is why legal teams still rely on it heavily.

• Powerful redlining – Track Changes and comments support detailed, line-by-line negotiation, with clear attribution for each edit.

• Precise legal formatting – Styles and multi-level lists handle clause numbering, schedules, and annexes accurately when configured well.

• Robust comparison – Document comparison and blackline views help detect untracked edits, a common concern in high-stakes deals.

Cons

• Limited repository features – Word itself is not a contract document management system. Version control, search, and permissions rely on whatever file storage or DMS you pair it with.

• Security and hidden changes risks – SpotDraft highlights that it is easy to turn off Track Changes or strip metadata, which can leave unnoticed edits or comments in “clean” files if you do not scrub them carefully.

• Version chaos across copies – Emailing Word files back and forth quickly creates multiple versions with different edits, making legal contract tracking software or a centralized CLM attractive as volume grows.

• Not purpose-built CLM – Word is a general-purpose editor. As SpotDraft notes, modern contracting has moved beyond its natural capabilities, and there are better tools for complete lifecycle workflows.

Best for and use cases

• In-house legal teams that want tight control over language and rely on detailed redlines for complex commercial, IP, or financing agreements.

• Outside counsel who work across many clients and need a universal, accepted format for exchanging drafts with counterparties.

• Organizations with mature DMS setups where Word Online is just one layer in a broader contract management software for legal stack, backed by SharePoint, a CLM, or another repository.

In these scenarios, Word remains the negotiation workbench, while other tools handle workflow automation, storage, and reporting.

Negotiation tip

To reduce back-and-forth on governing law, you can keep a simple fallback in your playbook and drop it into Word when parties are stuck.

If parties cannot agree, use the state of the defendant’s principal place of business.

Store this alongside your preferred position in a separate “Playbook” document or clause bank. During redlines, you can insert the fallback language directly into the clause and use comments to explain why this compromise is acceptable, keeping negotiations moving while still managing risk.

HTML cues

Because Word files are easy to copy and rename, disciplined version control is critical, especially once you plug Word into a broader legal contract management stack.

• Version control checklist

• Keep one system of record (DMS, SharePoint, or CLM) where the latest version lives.


• Use a consistent naming convention (e.g., _MSA_ClientName_v3_Internal_ , _v4_Counterparty_).


• Turn on Track Changes for all negotiations and leave it on for the full redline cycle [(source)](https://www.spotdraft.com/blog/redlining-in-word).


• Before sending a “clean” execution copy, accept or reject all changes and remove comments and hidden metadata.


• After signature, save a read-only PDF in your system of record and mark the Word file as archived.

Mapping sections to reviewers like this makes it easier to pair Word Online with a repository or CLM and answer, in practical terms, what is a contract management system for your team: not just software, but a coordinated workflow where Word handles redlines and your other tools manage storage, access, and lifecycle tracking. From here, it becomes natural to look at tools focused on clause research and standardized templates, which is where the next option in this guide comes in.

Option 7 Law Insider clause research and drafting acceleration

When you hit a tricky clause and wonder what "market" really looks like, guessing is risky. Law Insider gives you a searchable library of real-world contracts and clauses so you can anchor your drafting in language that has actually been used and tested in practice.

Why choose this for clause discovery

Law Insider started as a large database of public contracts and clauses, and over more than a decade it has grown into a deep, searchable repository used by over a million legal professionals worldwide. Think of it as highly specialized contract reading software: instead of reading entire agreements line by line, you can jump straight to the specific provision you care about and see dozens of real examples.

Because the sample language comes from actual filed agreements, it is especially useful when you want clauses that will stand up in negotiations and reflect real allocation of risk. You can search for:

• Market-standard wording for indemnity, limitation of liability, and data security provisions.

• Alternative formulations when your preferred clause is rejected and you need a reasonable fallback.

• Definitions and carve-outs that align with industry practice in your sector.

On top of the raw database, Law Insider now layers AI-powered review and drafting tools. Its engine analyzes clauses against millions of examples and assigns an Index Score that benchmarks how close a clause is to market norms (source). That Index Score effectively turns the platform into contract analytics software, giving you quantitative insight instead of relying only on intuition.

If you are exploring what are clm tools beyond simple storage and e-sign, Law Insider slots in as a research and analysis layer that can feed better language into whatever drafting or CLM system you already use.

Workflow tips

To get real value rather than one-off searches, you will want to turn Law Insider into part of a repeatable research and playbook workflow.

• Build a clause library by topic

• Create internal folders or a database for key topics: Indemnity, Limitation of Liability, Data Security, Insurance, Termination, SLAs.


• For each topic, run searches on Law Insider, filter to recent agreements in your industry, and save 3–5 examples that reflect different risk levels [(source)](https://directory.lawnext.com/products/law-insider-contract-and-clause-database/).


• Tag each example as Preferred, Acceptable, or High Risk so reviewers can see at a glance how aggressive the language is.

• Save snippets with citations

• When you find strong language, copy the clause into your internal clause bank and note the source deal, date, and any jurisdiction information.


• Include the Law Insider link so you or colleagues can click back to the full agreement if context is needed later.


• This turns ad hoc browsing into structured contract review and management services that your whole team can reuse.

• Use AI-assisted benchmarking

• With Law Insider's AI tools, you can paste your current clause and compare it to market-standard variants using the Index Score.


• If the score is low, review suggested alternatives or pull new examples from the database and update your playbook accordingly.

• Link to internal templates

• Wherever you store templates (Word, AFFiNE, Notion, a CLM), add links or references back to the clause records that came from Law Insider.


• That way, anyone updating an NDA, MSA, or SOW can see the underlying research and quickly swap in a different risk position when needed.

Combined, these practices let you use Law Insider not just as contract reading software but as a living source for your internal playbooks and contract risk management tools.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Vast real-world corpus – Millions of contracts and clauses drawn from public filings provide a deep base for research.

• Market-grounded language – Clauses are taken from agreements that have been used in real transactions, not just theoretical models.

• AI-assisted benchmarking – The Law Insider Index Score benchmarks clauses against the database to show how market-standard they are.

• Time savings – Instead of drafting from scratch, you start from curated examples and adapt, which can significantly cut review time.

Cons

• Variable quality and relevance – Not every public agreement reflects your risk appetite, industry norms, or jurisdiction; results still need curation.

• Legal judgment required – Even with AI, content must be reviewed by qualified counsel to ensure it fits the specific deal and governing law.

• Learning curve for AI playbooks – To get the most out of the AI review tools, you must define and tune playbooks, which takes initial setup effort (source).

Best for and use cases

• Legal operations teams building standardized playbooks and fallback language for a growing volume of contracts.

• In-house counsel who need fast answers to "Is this clause market?" and want data-backed support when pushing back on aggressive terms.

• Law firms and boutiques that want to accelerate research and offer more efficient contract review and management services for clients.

• Teams comparing CLM options that want a research layer to feed better clauses into the most efficient clm software for handling vendor agreements or customer deals.

In each of these scenarios, Law Insider does not replace a full CLM; instead, it strengthens whatever system you choose by upgrading the quality of your underlying language.

Negotiation fallback

You will notice negotiations move faster when you have pre-approved fallback positions that are grounded in external examples. For indemnity and liability alignment, one common approach is to keep the indemnity cap in step with the overall limitation of liability, except for a few high-risk carve-outs.

Indemnity obligations are capped at the same amount as the Limitation of Liability unless arising from third party IP claims or confidentiality breaches.

You can store this as your standard fallback in your clause library and, using Law Insider, pull supporting examples from comparable agreements. When a counterparty challenges the structure, you can point to market data instead of arguing from theory.

HTML cues

To make your research repeatable and easy to scan, structure your clause library and search habits with simple conventions.

• Useful search operators and filters

• Search by exact phrase in quotes for very specific language (for example, "consequential, incidental, special, or punitive damages").


• Filter by agreement type (SaaS agreement, license agreement, services agreement) to keep results close to your use case.


• Filter by industry or counterparty type when available to focus on peers.


• Use date filters to prioritize more recent agreements that reflect current practice.


• Combine keyword plus topic (for example, "data breach notification" within data processing or security sections).

• Internal clause mapping table – create a simple table in your playbook to align variants and risk.

Once you have this structure in place, it becomes much easier to plug Law Insider into your broader tooling. Whether you are building playbooks for a CLM rollout or supporting procurement with the most efficient clm software for handling vendor agreements, this clause research layer helps ensure the contracts you draft in the next tools on this list start from stronger, better-aligned language.

Option 8 oneNDA open standard template for fast NDAs

When every new NDA kicks off a fresh round of markups, deals slow down quickly. oneNDA offers a standard, open template designed to cut that friction so you can move from first discussion to signature with far less back-and-forth.

Why choose this for standardized NDAs

oneNDA is a free, open-source Non-Disclosure Agreement template created by legal professionals to standardize routine confidentiality contracts. Traditional NDAs tend to look different at every company, even though the underlying obligations are similar. That lack of standardization drives negotiations over low-value details and adds an administrative burden for legal teams managing many slightly different versions (source).

With oneNDA, you adopt a balanced, community-vetted template instead of reinventing it. It is designed to be:

• Straightforward – focused on the essentials, avoiding unnecessary jargon and excessive clauses that rarely add value.

• Balanced and fair – crafted to protect both parties, which reduces the need for long negotiations about one-sided terms.

• Open and free – you can use it without bespoke drafting costs, which is especially attractive for contract management for small business and startups with lean legal budgets.

Because the template is open and community-driven, it also fits neatly into open source contract management strategies where you want transparent, standard building blocks instead of proprietary forms. Over time, adopting oneNDA can reduce variance across your NDA portfolio, which in turn makes it easier to monitor terms using whatever contract compliance tracking software or manual processes you rely on.

Implementation tips

Sounds complex to roll out a new standard? In practice, you can pilot oneNDA in a few straightforward steps.

• Understand and socialize the templateBefore rollout, make sure you and key stakeholders understand what oneNDA is and why it helps. The project’s creators position it as an open-source, standardized NDA that reduces negotiation time and cost by giving everyone the same, fair starting point. Share that vision with Sales, Procurement, and Legal so they see how it addresses existing pain points like delays and inconsistent practices.

• Host the latest version in your repositoryDownload the current oneNDA template from the official source and save it in your central repository (for example, AFFiNE, Notion, SharePoint, or another system). Treat it as a controlled master, so everyone starts NDAs from this file rather than copying old variations. This aligns with company contract management best practices where there is one approved standard rather than many local edits.

• Add a simple data capture layerTo make it easy for business users, pair the template with a short intake form or cover sheet capturing fields such as:

• Disclosing party name


• Receiving party name


• Effective date


• Term and survival period


• Governing law and jurisdiction


• Business owner / requester

These can live in a lightweight database, spreadsheet, or even a contract management template excel file if you are just starting. Having the data structured from day one makes tracking and reporting easier later.

• Run a pilot before full rolloutAs the oneNDA team recommends, begin with a pilot group, such as Sales or Procurement, and collect feedback on how well the new template fits their workflows (source). Use that input to clarify guidance (for example, when exceptions are allowed) before scaling across the organization.

• Maintain an exceptions logWhen counterparties insist on changes, capture each deviation in a simple log with columns for counterparty, reason, and approved variation. Whether you track this in a CLM, a shared sheet, or basic contract compliance tracking software, the goal is to avoid one-off edits that no one remembers later.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Community norm – oneNDA is designed as a shared standard so that more organizations can align on a single, predictable NDA framework.

• Predictable and balanced – its language is crafted to be fair to both sides, which lowers the incentive to heavily redline routine NDAs.

• Easy adoption – the template is simple and free to access, making it especially accessible for contract management for small business and startups that lack in-house counsel.

• Reduces low-value legal work – by standardizing a document that is rarely litigated but often negotiated, legal teams can redirect time to higher-impact tasks.

Cons

• Limited to NDA scope – oneNDA is focused specifically on Non-Disclosure Agreements; you still need separate templates for MSAs, SOWs, and DPAs.

• May not cover bespoke needs – highly regulated industries or unusual confidentiality scenarios may still require tailored clauses and internal review.

• Change management effort – to realize the benefits, you have to persuade internal teams and counterparties to accept a new standard rather than their legacy forms (source).

Best for and use cases

• Sales discovery and demos – when you frequently sign NDAs before sharing product roadmaps or pricing structures with prospects.

• Vendor diligence – for quick two-way confidentiality with potential suppliers or partners during evaluation.

• Trial and sandbox access – when prospects or partners need temporary access to environments or data under standard confidentiality obligations.

• High-volume NDA environments – accelerators, incubators, and early-stage ecosystems where many small NDAs are signed every month.

In all of these scenarios, standardization matters more than aggressive customization, which makes oneNDA a practical baseline that also slots cleanly into broader company contract management frameworks.

Negotiation fallback

You will notice that many NDA disputes center on whether information flows one way or both ways. Having clear, simple fallback guidance for this question helps keep discussions short.

Mutual vs One Way If the recipient is also disclosing during the evaluation, convert to mutual by applying reciprocal obligations without altering exclusions.

Store this guidance alongside your oneNDA copy and in your clause playbook. When a counterparty asks for a mutual NDA, you can refer back to this principle, adjust only the necessary party references, and keep the core risk allocation intact instead of rebuilding the agreement from scratch.

HTML cues

To make oneNDA easy for business users to complete correctly, pair the template with a short checklist of fields they must fill in before sending it for signature.

• Fast-fill NDA fields

• Full legal name of disclosing party


• Full legal name of receiving party


• Address or principal place of business for each party


• Effective date of the NDA


• Purpose or permitted use of confidential information


• Duration of the confidentiality obligation


• Governing law and venue


• Internal business owner / requester

By treating oneNDA as a standardized building block in your stack, you can keep NDAs simple while reserving your heavier tools and processes for higher-value agreements. From there, it becomes easier to plug this NDA layer into more advanced contract lifecycle tools or template workspaces, like the workflow-centric platforms covered in the next option.

Option 9 DocHub lightweight PDF editing and e sign

When a counterparty sends back a scanned contract and asks you to “just sign and return,” firing up a full CLM stack is overkill. DocHub gives you a browser-based way to upload, edit, and sign PDFs quickly, which is often all you need for simple agreements and forms.

Why choose this for quick PDF edits and signatures

DocHub is designed as an online tool to edit, send, and sign PDF documents with a streamlined interface that runs in your browser, so there is no desktop install required. You start by opening the DocHub website, creating an account, and choosing the “New Document” option. From there, you can drag and drop a PDF or import it directly from cloud storage like Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, or Box (source).

Once the file is loaded, DocHub provides basic editing tools such as highlight, text, and whiteout so you can make minor adjustments to contracts without going back to Word. The signature workflow is equally straightforward: you click “Sign,” create a signature by typing, drawing, or uploading it, save it as default, and then place it on the document wherever required. After that, you can export the signed PDF using the built-in Download/Export options.

DocHub also supports requesting signatures from others. You place signature fields, use the “Request signatures from others” option, add email addresses, and send the request; recipients can sign without printing or scanning, and DocHub notifies you when the process is complete. For many teams that just need simple contract management software on top of PDFs, this upload–annotate–sign–export cycle is often enough. Because free plans can change, you should always confirm current limitations and transaction caps on DocHub’s own site before building your process around them.

Setup flow

Imagine you send the same contractor agreement dozens of times a year and most recipients only ever see it as a PDF. Here is a practical way to turn DocHub into a reusable, low-friction workflow.

• Prepare a base contractor PDF

• Start from your approved contractor agreement in Word or Google Docs and export a clean PDF.


• Upload this PDF to DocHub as your master copy.

• Convert it into a reusable template

• Open the document in DocHub and use the menu path _Menu → Actions → Convert to Template_ to create a DocHub Template.


• This lets you send fresh copies to different signers without editing the underlying file each time.

• Add fillable fields for key terms

• Use the Field Manager to add text fields for rate, term, and scope summary, plus date fields and checkboxes where needed [(source)](https://help.dochub.com/knowledge-base/dochub-templates/creating-and-sending-a-reusable-template).


• Assign each field to a role such as “Signer,” “Client,” or “Contractor” so DocHub knows who completes which part.

• Define signer roles and basic signing order

• Within the template, map fields to roles (for example, Contractor, Client Signer).


• When you send a sign request, add each signer’s email in the order you want them to receive the document; DocHub will route and notify them accordingly.

• Send, stay on template, and repeat

• Use “Send as Sign Request,” enter the signer’s email, and send.


• Choose “Stay on Template” instead of editing the signed copy, so you can immediately send the next contractor agreement without rebuilding fields.

This setup turns DocHub into a focused contract tracking software solution for simple PDFs: you keep terms locked in the template, swap out key data via fields, and push each new version through the same signature flow.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Fast for PDFs – Browser-based editing and signing mean you can handle agreements without installing extra software.

• Simple signatures – Creating and reusing a digital signature takes only a few steps, and signers do not need to print or scan.

• Reusable templates – Template conversion plus role-based fields let you send the same form to many signers efficiently.

• Cloud imports – Integration with Google Drive, OneDrive, Box, and Dropbox makes it easy to bring in existing contracts and save signed copies.

Cons

• Limited authoring for complex contracts – DocHub works best on preformatted PDFs; for heavy clause drafting and redlines, you will still rely on Word or another editor.

• Repository depth is basic – DocHub includes folders and an activity timeline, but it is not a full-featured repository or contract renewal management system; long-term organization may require pairing it with other tools (source).

• Plan limits matter – Free plans cap sign requests and document volumes, so you must check current limits and upgrade if your volume grows.

If you think of it as lightweight, task-focused contract management software freeware rather than an all-in-one platform, expectations stay aligned.

Best for and use cases

• Freelancers and contractors who need a quick way to sign or send standard agreements, scopes, and change orders as PDFs.

• Small agencies that work mainly with fixed-form statements of work, creative briefs, or approval forms and want simple contract management applications without a big setup.

• HR and people teams managing offer letters, policy acknowledgments, and onboarding packets that are usually distributed as PDFs.

In these scenarios, DocHub fills the gap between email-only workflows and heavier platforms, giving you a pragmatic layer for PDF execution that can sit alongside more structured systems for broader contract renewal management and reporting.

Negotiation fallback

Even when you are just editing PDFs, you still face recurring negotiation points. One of the most common is how either side can walk away from an ongoing services arrangement.

Either party may terminate on 30 days’ written notice; Client will pay for services rendered and non-cancellable commitments.

Keeping this kind of pre-approved fallback language in your source Word document or internal playbook makes it easy to update the PDF template before you re-upload it to DocHub, so your simple contract management software layer stays aligned with legal’s current positions.

HTML cues

To reduce errors when sending templates for signature, it helps to be explicit about who does what and where key data comes from.

• Signer roles and required fields

• Contractor signer – name, signature, date, tax ID if applicable.


• Client signer – name, title, signature, date.


• Internal approver (optional) – initial or signature field on an internal-only copy.


• Key fields – rate, currency, service description, start date, end date, renewal or extension terms.

By pairing DocHub’s quick PDF signing with clear roles, fields, and upstream data sources, you get a nimble layer of contract management software freeware that handles signatures cleanly while leaving complex drafting, storage, and analytics to the other tools in your stack. From here, it is a natural step to explore workflow-centric platforms that combine docs with tasks and approvals, like the next option in this guide.

Option 10 ClickUp workflow centric docs and approvals

When contracts keep slipping through the cracks between legal, sales, and procurement, you do not just need better templates. You need one contract management platform that ties documents, tasks, and approvals together so every stakeholder sees the same picture. ClickUp is built around tasks and Docs, which makes it a strong workflow hub for drafting, review, and renewals.

Why choose this for workflow plus docs

ClickUp combines task lists, Docs, dashboards, and automations in a single workspace, so you can attach contract content directly to the workflows that move it forward. Instead of tracking drafts in email and renewal dates in spreadsheets, you anchor them to tasks with clear owners, due dates, and statuses. As ClickUp’s own contract lifecycle content explains, this approach helps avoid scattered documents, missed approvals, and unclear responsibilities by centralizing every phase of the contract lifecycle in one place.

For authoring, ClickUp Docs provide a flexible space to draft work contracts and related agreements. The ClickUp Work Contract Template, for example, walks you through defining parties, scope, payment terms, and expectations in a structured Doc, then uses tasks, Milestones, and Table view to track obligations and deadlines around that contract. You can adapt the same pattern for NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, and vendor contracts.

Custom fields on tasks let you tag each contract with stage, risk level, renewal date, and value. Combined with automations and dashboards, these features help ClickUp feel like one of the top contract management software options for teams that care as much about execution and follow-through as they do about drafting. Because it already supports permissions and approvals, and offers ClickUp Brain as a paid add-on for AI summaries and reminders, it also aligns with what many buyers look for in scalable clm platforms for multi-department collaboration.

Setup recipe

Imagine you want a central pipeline where every contract has a clear owner, status, and renewal plan. Here is a simple way to build that in ClickUp using only core building blocks and the patterns described in ClickUp’s own renewal and contract templates guidance.

• Create a Contracts list

• In a dedicated Space (for example, Legal or Procurement), create a folder called _Contracts_ and add a list named _All Contracts_.


• Each task in this list represents a single agreement (NDA, MSA, SOW, vendor contract, or work contract).

• Add core custom fields

• Stage (Draft, Internal Review, Vendor Review, Pending Signature, Active, Expired).


• Contract Type (NDA, MSA, SOW, Work Contract, Vendor Agreement, DPA).


• Risk Tier (Low, Medium, High).


• Effective Date and Renewal Date (date fields).


• Auto-Renew (checkbox).


• Value (number or currency).


• Counterparty (text or link to a separate Vendors list).

These fields turn your list into a mini contract risk management software layer, allowing powerful filters and dashboards without leaving ClickUp.

• Attach Doc templates for MSA and SOW

• Create ClickUp Docs for your base MSA, SOW, and work contract templates, or start from the Work Contract Template in the ClickUp gallery.


• Pin these Docs in the list or attach a copy to each contract task, so drafting happens next to the task’s comments, fields, and subtasks.


• Use headings and checklists inside each Doc to mirror your standard structure (Parties, Scope, Payment, IP, Confidentiality, Term, Termination, SLAs).

• Build automations for risk and renewals

• Configure automations so that when _Risk Tier_ is set to _High_ , ClickUp automatically assigns the task to Legal and adds a checklist for extra review steps, reflecting the “standardized workflows” principle in ClickUp’s CLM use cases [(source)](https://clickup.com/p/task-management-software/contract-lifecycle-management).


• Use ClickUp Brain or date-based automations to send reminders 60 or 90 days before the Renewal Date, mirroring the renewal alerts described in ClickUp’s vendor contract renewal guide.


• Change Stage automatically to _Pending Signature_ when all checklist items are completed.

• Design dashboards for visibility

• Create a ClickUp Dashboard that shows widgets for _Contracts by Stage_ , _Contracts Expiring in 90 Days_ , and _High-Risk Contracts_ , similar to the renewal monitoring examples in ClickUp’s documentation.


• Include a table widget filtered to tasks where Stage is not _Active_ or _Expired_ so Legal and Procurement see every open contract at a glance.

With this setup, ClickUp becomes a practical, task-first contract management platform. It may not replace heavy drafting tools, but it does give you an operational backbone for tracking obligations, approvals, and renewals, which is exactly where many stacks are weakest.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Unified tasks and docs – Contracts live as tasks with attached Docs, comments, and files, so discussions and decisions stay close to the agreement itself.

• Powerful automation and reminders – Automations and ClickUp Brain can handle renewal alerts, assignments, and status changes, reducing manual follow-up and missed deadlines.

• Configurable views and dashboards – Lists, Board view, Calendar, and dashboards give different teams the views they need, from renewal pipelines to high-risk deal queues.

• Scales across departments – The same workspace can support legal, procurement, sales, and finance, which is why many teams treat ClickUp as one of the more scalable clm platforms for multi-department collaboration, especially when paired with other drafting or signing tools.

Cons

• Advanced redlining still external – Detailed clause markups are usually done in Word or another editor, then uploaded, since ClickUp Docs are not full-featured legal redline environments.

• Repository depth depends on your structure – ClickUp stores files and tasks well, but long-term repository analytics and clause-level reporting require careful taxonomy and, in some cases, a dedicated CLM alongside it.

• Setup effort for best results – To rival the best app to keep track of contract renewals, you must invest in clean fields, automation rules, and dashboard design; otherwise, it behaves like a generic task list.

Best for and use cases

• Operations-led teams that want one place to see drafting status, internal reviews, vendor negotiations, and renewals without jumping between several systems.

• Procurement and vendor management teams using dashboards and reminders to stay ahead of vendor contract renewal cycles, as described in ClickUp’s own renewal workflows.

• Revenue and customer success teams that need visibility into renewal dates, expansion opportunities, and high-risk terms while still working inside their everyday task environment.

• Organizations piloting CLM practices that want to experiment with workflows, approvals, and AI summaries before committing to a dedicated CLM suite or other top contract management software products.

In these scenarios, ClickUp often acts as an orchestration layer. Dedicated editors, e-sign tools, or CLM systems handle heavy legal features, while ClickUp keeps the work visible, assigned, and on schedule.

Negotiation fallback

Because ClickUp tasks naturally capture comments and subtasks, it is a good place to store standardized negotiation positions right next to each agreement. You can create a recurring subtask called “Data Processing fallback check” and keep your pre-approved compromise language there.

Data Processing If not ready for a DPA, "Parties agree to execute a DPA incorporating standard contractual clauses upon processing of personal data."

When business owners push to close a deal before a full DPA is in place, Legal can reference this fallback in the task, log the decision, and ensure the follow-up DPA task is created with a due date. Over time, these patterns become part of your informal contract risk management software workflow, even if ClickUp is not your primary repository.

HTML cues

To make your ClickUp workspace predictable and easy to understand at a glance, standardize checklists and approval roles across all contract tasks.

• Stage checklist for each contract

• Template selected and commercial terms drafted.


• Legal review completed and comments resolved.


• Security / Privacy review (if personal data or sensitive systems involved).


• Finance review of pricing, billing terms, and non-standard economics.


• Business owner approval of scope and SLAs.


• Final sign-off and handoff to e-sign or execution tool.


• Signed contract uploaded and Renewal Date field confirmed.

Finally, build a dashboard card that shows renewals in the next 60 and 90 days and tasks due this week, using ClickUp Brain and date filters to surface what matters most. Supported by these views and conventions, ClickUp can sit alongside more specialized tools as one of the ai-powered clm tools tailored to enterprise needs, especially when your core challenge is keeping multi-team workflows aligned. Together with the earlier options in this guide, it rounds out a practical toolkit for teams searching for the 10 Best Free Contract Templates & Management Tools for 2026.

FAQs about free contract templates and management tools

1. What is a contract management system and why do small businesses need one?

A contract management system is the combination of tools and workflows you use to draft, approve, sign, store, and renew contracts. For small businesses, this can be as simple as Google Docs templates plus a structured folder in Drive, or as advanced as a workspace like AFFiNE or ClickUp with databases, tasks, and dashboards. The key benefits are a single source of truth, clear ownership for each agreement, reminders for renewals, and less time wasted hunting through email or desktops for the latest version.

2. Does Microsoft offer contract management software?

Microsoft does not ship a full CLM suite out of the box, but many teams effectively build a contract stack around Word Online and OneDrive or SharePoint. Word Online handles redlines and precise legal formatting, while SharePoint or another DMS functions as the repository for version control and permissions. Some organizations then connect Word to dedicated CLM tools or workspaces like AFFiNE to add structured databases, approval flows, and renewal tracking on top of the familiar Microsoft editing environment.

3. How do I choose the best free contract management tool for my team?

Start by mapping your biggest pain points. If formatting breaks and scattered drafts are your main issue, a block-based workspace like AFFiNE is strong, because it combines templates, embedded tables, and visual canvases in one place. If you mainly need flexible databases, Notion or Airtable are good fits. For quick collaboration, Google Docs and Drive work well, while PandaDoc or DocHub help with standardized PDFs and e‑sign. Finally, ClickUp is useful when workflow, tasks, and approvals are your top priority. Match the tool to where deals are currently getting stuck.

4. What are CLM tools and how do they differ from simple e‑signature apps?

CLM tools, or contract lifecycle management tools, are platforms that support the whole lifecycle of an agreement: request, drafting, negotiation, approval, signature, storage, and renewal. They often include databases, playbooks, workflows, and reporting. Simple e‑signature apps focus mainly on sending documents for signature and collecting electronic signatures. In this guide, AFFiNE, Airtable, and ClickUp can be configured to behave more like lightweight CLM workspaces, while DocHub is closer to a focused PDF signing utility you pair with other systems.

5. How can I keep contracts organized and avoid losing track of renewals?

Whichever tool you choose, you need three basics: structured data, clear stages, and alerts. First, capture key fields such as counterparty, owner, value, effective date, and renewal date in a database or at least a spreadsheet linked to each file. Second, define standard stages like Draft, Review, Execution, and Active, and reflect them in views or boards. Third, set up reminders 60–90 days before renewal using filters or automations, for example in AFFiNE database views, Airtable filters, or ClickUp automations. This turns your workspace into a simple but effective contract renewal management hub.

Related Blog Posts

1. Never Miss A Step: 10 Free, Editable Checklist Templates

2. 10 Best Technical Documentation Software & Tools For ...

3. Reclaim Up To 3 Hours Daily With 9 Smart Data Entry Tools