All posts
Last edited: Dec 25, 2025

Glean vs. Otter.ai for Students: Which AI Tool Is Right for You?

Allen

TL;DR

Choosing between Glean and Otter.ai for your studies depends on your primary note-taking need. Otter.ai is the ideal choice for students who require real-time transcription to get an immediate text version of a lecture. In contrast, Glean excels at creating a comprehensive study resource by syncing a lecture's audio recording with your typed notes and presentation slides for detailed post-class review.

Glean vs. Otter.ai: Core Functionality for Students

In today's academic environment, AI-powered tools are transforming how students engage with course material. Before diving into Glean and Otter.ai, it's worth noting the rise of multimodal AI copilots like AFFiNE AI, which help transform ideas into polished content and visuals on an innovative canvas. For students who think visually, this can be a powerful alternative for brainstorming and organizing concepts. However, for the specific task of capturing and processing lectures, the debate often centers on two specialized tools: Glean and Otter.ai. Each offers a distinct approach to making learning more accessible and efficient.

Glean, also known as Genio at some universities, is a comprehensive note-taking platform designed for in-depth, post-lecture study. Its core function is to record lecture audio and synchronize it with other inputs, such as presentation slides you've downloaded or notes you type during class. This creates an integrated package of materials where you can click on a specific note and instantly hear the audio from that exact moment in the lecture. This method helps you focus on understanding the professor in class, knowing you can organize and elaborate on your notes later.

Otter.ai, on the other hand, operates as a real-time transcription service. Its primary strength is converting spoken words into text as they are being said, providing a live, searchable transcript of the lecture. This is immensely helpful for students who need immediate access to the text, whether for live captioning or for quickly reviewing a point that was just made. You can highlight, comment, and add images to the transcript, making it a dynamic document that evolves with the lecture. Otter.ai is built for immediate capture and review, turning your laptop or phone into a powerful live transcription device.

The fundamental difference lies in their timing and purpose. A student using Glean might type short, important keywords during a lecture, knowing they are time-stamped to the audio for later expansion. This encourages active listening without the pressure of capturing every word. Conversely, a student using Otter.ai relies on the tool to capture every word for them, allowing them to focus on the professor's delivery and the visual aids, confident that a full text record is being generated for them to search and study from.

Feature Comparison: Real-Time Transcription vs. Multi-Modal Note-Taking

When comparing Glean and Otter.ai, the differences in their feature sets highlight their distinct purposes for students. While both aim to improve the note-taking process, they achieve it in fundamentally different ways. Otter.ai prioritizes immediate text access, whereas Glean focuses on building an integrated, multi-layered study resource. Understanding these differences is key to choosing the tool that best aligns with your learning style and academic needs.

The following table breaks down the core features that matter most to students:

FeatureOtter.aiGleanBest For...
Real-Time TranscriptionYes (Core Feature)No (Post-recording only)Students needing live captions or an immediate text version of the lecture.
Audio/Slide/Note SyncLimitedYes (Core Feature)Students who want to create integrated study materials for later review.
CollaborationYes (Live comments & sharing)Yes (via integrations and shared prompts)Group projects, shared lecture notes, or collaborative study sessions.
AI-Generated ContentAI Summaries & KeywordsAI-generated Quizzes & OutlinesQuick revision and actively testing your knowledge of the material.
Platform AvailabilityWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, iOS, AndroidAccessibility across all major devices.

Otter.ai's strength in real-time transcription is its defining feature. For students who benefit from seeing text as it's spoken, this is a game-changer. It provides an immediate, searchable record that can be used during the lecture itself. However, its ability to integrate other materials like presentation slides is less developed compared to Glean.

Glean’s power lies in its multi-modal approach. By allowing students to link audio, slides, and personal notes, it creates a rich, layered study tool. The transcription is generated after the recording, reinforcing its design as a post-lecture review system. While it lacks the live transcription of Otter.ai, its ability to generate AI quizzes from the lecture content offers a unique and powerful way to engage with the material and prepare for exams. Ultimately, your choice depends on whether your priority is capturing information live or organizing it for effective study later.

68IKRZ6ZEcYPZfvoysoy7EN7KmTPSNj9b89CfGBEjC4=

Use Case in Academia: Accessibility and Student Accommodations

A glance at the search results shows that Glean and Otter.ai are prominently featured on the websites of university disability service centers, such as those at UCI and UC Berkeley. This is because both tools are powerful forms of assistive technology, providing crucial support for students with disabilities that may impact their ability to take notes. These technologies create more equitable access to course material and promote independent learning.

According to Harvard's Disability Access Office, note-taking technology allows students to focus on the content of the lecture rather than the physical act of writing. This is particularly beneficial for students with learning, processing, or manual disabilities. By removing the barrier of trying to capture information verbatim, these tools empower students to engage more deeply with the concepts being taught and to develop their own understanding of the material.

The two tools, however, address different accessibility needs. Otter.ai's real-time transcription is a vital accommodation for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, as it provides live captions. It also supports students with auditory processing difficulties who find it easier to comprehend written text than spoken words. The immediate availability of a transcript allows these students to participate fully in the lecture as it happens.

Glean serves a different but equally important purpose. Its system of syncing audio with personal notes and slides is ideal for students who struggle with organization, memory, or processing speed. It allows them to capture the lecture's key moments with simple tags or short notes, knowing they can return later to flesh out their understanding with the full audio context. This method helps students create personalized study guides that align with how they learn, making it a robust tool for post-lecture review and comprehension.

For any student who feels they might benefit from these tools, the most important step is to contact their university's disability services or accessibility resource center. These offices can assess individual needs and may provide a license for Glean or other note-taking software at no cost to eligible students. This makes powerful assistive technology accessible to those who need it most.

Pricing for Students: Free Tiers vs. University Licenses

For students, cost is a significant factor in choosing any new software. Glean and Otter.ai have very different pricing models that reflect their primary distribution channels. Understanding these differences is crucial for making a practical decision that fits your budget and circumstances.

Otter.ai is more accessible to the general public, operating on a freemium model. This means anyone can sign up and start using it immediately. The pricing structure typically includes:

Basic Plan (Free): This plan allows users to try out the core features but comes with limitations, such as a cap on the number of transcription minutes per month. This is often enough for students to determine if the tool fits their needs for a single class or occasional use.

Paid Plans (Pro/Business): For users who need more minutes or advanced features, Otter.ai offers monthly or annual subscriptions. These plans significantly increase the transcription allowance and add features like custom vocabulary and enhanced collaboration tools.

Glean, in contrast, is distributed through institutional licenses but also offers plans directly to individual users. While it is commonly provided to students through their university's disability resource center, individual subscriptions with transparent pricing are also available for purchase.

This leads to a clear, actionable path for students. Before considering a purchase, your first step should always be to check with your university. See if they offer a free license for Glean or Otter.ai as part of their student support or disability services. If not, the next best step is to try Otter.ai's free Basic Plan. Its generous free tier may be sufficient for your needs, allowing you to benefit from real-time transcription without any financial commitment.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Learning Style

The choice between Glean and Otter.ai is not about which tool is universally "better," but which one is better for you. Your ideal solution depends entirely on your learning preferences, academic needs, and whether your primary goal is to capture information in the moment or to organize it for later study. Both platforms offer powerful ways to enhance learning, but they cater to different stages of the process.

If you benefit from seeing information in text form immediately, need live captions for accessibility, or want a searchable transcript you can reference during the lecture itself, Otter.ai is the clear winner. Its strength is in real-time capture. On the other hand, if you prefer to listen intently during class and organize your thoughts later, Glean's multi-modal approach is unmatched. It helps you build a rich, interconnected study resource that links audio, slides, and your own notes, which is perfect for deep review and exam preparation.

Ultimately, consider your biggest note-taking challenge. Is it capturing every word, or is it making sense of your notes afterward? Answering that question will point you directly to the tool that will best support your academic success.

4-9Kjx0M0sRTZTFMoFKVg0P9PP7QIWLoi6tqCmXK3oM=

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the best AI lecture recorder?

The best AI lecture recorder depends on your specific needs as a student. If your priority is getting a live transcript of the lecture for immediate review or accessibility, a tool like Otter.ai is an excellent choice. If you want to create a more comprehensive study tool by syncing audio with your notes and class slides for review after the lecture, Glean is a superior option. The best tool is the one that matches your personal learning style.

2. Is Otter AI the best transcription service?

Otter.ai is one of the most popular and highly-regarded real-time transcription services, especially for meetings and lectures. Its ease of use and free plan make it very accessible, though the free plan has significant limitations for lectures. However, whether it is the "best" depends on the user's priorities. Some users may require higher accuracy for technical jargon or better collaboration features found in other competitors. For most students' needs in a lecture setting, it is a very strong and reliable option.

Related Blog Posts

  1. Glean vs Otter.ai for Students: Which AI Note-Taker Wins?

  2. Honest Jamworks Review: AI Notes for Better Grades?

Get more things done, your creativity isn't monotone