When choosing between MeetGeek vs Fireflies, the decision hinges on your specific needs. Fireflies.ai is the superior choice for teams that require broad platform support and affordable, scalable pricing. In contrast, MeetGeek excels with a highly functional free plan and exceptionally well-structured AI summaries, making it ideal for individuals and small businesses. Fireflies offers slightly higher-rated transcription accuracy, while MeetGeek provides a more intuitive post-meeting experience.
At their core, both MeetGeek and Fireflies are AI meeting assistants designed to automate the tedious process of note-taking by recording, transcribing, and summarizing your calls. They integrate with your calendar and automatically join meetings to capture every detail. For Google Meet users, see our review of top AI meeting assistants for Google Meet. While their goal is the same, their performance in key areas shows important distinctions that can influence your decision. Both platforms boast high transcription accuracy, often cited around 90-95%, ensuring that the raw text of your conversations is captured reliably.
However, when digging into user-reported data, nuances emerge. According to user reviews on G2, Fireflies has a slight edge in core transcription, with its Speech-to-Text feature rated 8.9 out of 10, compared to MeetGeek's 8.5. This suggests that for conversations where every word matters, especially in noisy environments, Fireflies may provide more accurate results. This extends to its AI-driven summaries, where Fireflies also leads with a G2 rating of 9.1 versus MeetGeek's 8.6, indicating strong overall performance in generating meeting notes.
Despite the ratings, many users praise MeetGeek for the quality and structure of its AI summaries. While Fireflies excels at raw accuracy, MeetGeek is often lauded for creating more digestible and actionable outputs, clearly separating tasks, decisions, and highlights. This makes the post-meeting review process faster and more efficient for team alignment. Ultimately, your choice depends on what you value more: the highest possible transcription fidelity or the most organized and actionable summary. Once you have your AI-generated notes from either tool, you can take them a step further. For those looking to transform these outputs into more dynamic content, innovative tools can help. Transform your ideas into polished content, visuals, and presentations effortlessly with AFFiNE AI, your multimodal copilot for smarter note-taking and collaboration.
To provide a clear, data-driven overview, here is a side-by-side comparison of their core features:
| Feature | Fireflies.ai | MeetGeek |
|---|---|---|
| Transcription Accuracy | Up to 95%; G2 Speech-to-Text Rating: 8.9/10 | Up to 95%; G2 Speech-to-Text Rating: 8.5/10 |
| AI Summaries | Highly accurate; G2 Smart Summary Rating: 9.1/10 | Praised for structure, tasks, and highlights |
| Speaker Identification | Advanced and accurate | Reliable speaker recognition |
| Language Support | Supports over 100 languages | Supports over 60 languages |
An AI meeting assistant is only as good as its ability to integrate with your existing workflow. In this category, Fireflies emerges as the clear winner due to its broader native support for video conferencing platforms. This makes it a more versatile and future-proof option for larger organizations or teams that use a diverse set of communication tools. While both tools cover the most popular platforms, Fireflies' extended compatibility provides a significant advantage for some.
MeetGeek focuses on seamless integration with the market leaders: Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom. For the vast majority of businesses, this is entirely sufficient. However, Fireflies goes several steps further by also supporting platforms like Webex, Skype, and GoToMeeting, among others. This wider net ensures that no matter which tool a client or partner prefers, your meetings can be automatically captured and analyzed.
Beyond video conferencing, both platforms offer robust integrations with popular productivity and collaboration tools. You can connect either MeetGeek or Fireflies to applications like:
• Slack for sharing meeting summaries in channels.
• Asana, Trello, or Jira for creating tasks from meeting action items.
• HubSpot or Salesforce for logging meeting notes in your CRM.
Both tools also leverage Zapier, which unlocks connections to thousands of other applications. This means that while Fireflies has more direct integrations, MeetGeek can still be customized to fit complex workflows. The key takeaway is to audit your company's current and future video conferencing needs. If your team operates exclusively on Zoom, Teams, and Meet, MeetGeek is a perfect fit. If you require flexibility across a wider range of platforms, Fireflies is the more reliable choice.
Cost is a critical factor in any software decision, and the pricing structures of MeetGeek and Fireflies reveal different strategies and target audiences. The most significant distinction lies in their free offerings. MeetGeek provides one of the most generous free plans on the market , making it an incredibly attractive option for individuals, freelancers, and small teams just starting with AI note-takers. In contrast, Fireflies offers a more affordable entry point for its paid team plans, positioning it as the economical choice for growing businesses that need to scale.
MeetGeek's free plan includes 3 hours of transcription per month, access to meeting insights and highlights, and storage for your meetings. This is a substantial offering that allows users to experience the core value of the product without a financial commitment. Fireflies' free plan is more of a trial, with transcription credits that expire and more limited feature access, primarily designed to push users toward a paid subscription.
When it comes to paid tiers, the roles reverse. Fireflies' Pro plan starts at approximately $10 per user per month (when billed annually), offering unlimited transcription and many of its advanced features. MeetGeek's comparable Pro plan is priced at $15 per user per month. This makes Fireflies the more cost-effective solution for teams needing to provide access to multiple users. For a team of ten, this difference adds up to nearly $1,000 per year, a significant saving that makes Fireflies a compelling choice for budget-conscious organizations.
| Plan Tier | Fireflies.ai | MeetGeek |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Limited transcription credits, basic features | Winner: 3 hours/month, meeting insights, full-featured |
| Paid Team Plan (Pro) | Winner: Starts at ~$10/user/month (annual) | Starts at $15/user/month (monthly) |
This pricing analysis leads to a clear recommendation. If you are an individual user or a very small team with infrequent meetings, MeetGeek's free plan offers unbeatable value. If you are a growing team that requires unlimited transcription for multiple users, Fireflies' Pro plan is the more economical and scalable choice.
After a detailed comparison of features, integrations, and pricing, it's clear that neither MeetGeek nor Fireflies is universally superior. The 'best' AI meeting assistant is the one that aligns with your specific priorities, team size, and budget. The choice boils down to a trade-off between Fireflies' broad compatibility and team value versus MeetGeek's powerful free plan and superior summary structure.
Choose Fireflies.ai if:
• You are part of a growing or large team that needs an affordable, scalable solution.
• Your organization uses a wide variety of video conferencing tools beyond Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet.
• You prioritize the highest possible transcription accuracy for technical or compliance-heavy conversations.
• You need support for a broader range of spoken languages in your meetings.
Choose MeetGeek if:
• You are an individual, freelancer, or small team that wants the most functional free tool available.
• Your primary need is for well-structured, actionable summaries with clear tasks and highlights.
• Your team primarily uses Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, or Zoom for meetings.
• You value a clean, intuitive user interface for reviewing and sharing meeting notes.
In summary, your decision should be guided by your user profile. For a scaling business needing a versatile, budget-friendly tool, Fireflies is the logical choice. For an individual or small business focused on getting maximum value and highly organized summaries without a subscription, MeetGeek is the undeniable winner. The best final step is to try the free plan of the tool that best matches your needs and experience its workflow firsthand.
Yes, MeetGeek offers a robust free plan that is one of its main advantages. The free tier includes 3 hours of transcription per month, access to AI summaries and insights, and meeting data storage, making it one of the most feature-rich free options available for AI meeting assistants.
For paid team plans, Fireflies is generally more affordable. Its Pro plan starts at around $10 per user per month (billed annually), while MeetGeek's comparable Pro plan starts at $15 per user per month. This makes Fireflies the more economical choice for businesses needing to scale up with multiple users.
Both platforms claim high accuracy of around 90-95%. However, data from G2 user reviews suggests Fireflies has a slight advantage, with its Speech-to-Text feature receiving a higher rating than MeetGeek's. For most use cases, both are highly reliable, but Fireflies may have an edge in challenging audio conditions.